The partition of 1947 was inevitable

Announcement of Lord Mountbatten's plan for partition of India:

The partition of 1947 was inevitable

The partition of 1947 was inevitable

Wednesday 19 Augustby R M Pal This article was sent to us quite sometime back but could not be used earlier for unavoidable reasons.

We changed channels but all channels were telecasting the same news. There are two aspects to this observation: I am dealing with the first issue. One thing is clear, namely, that if there were no partition, Gandhi would not have been assassinated in and there would have been no Kashmir war.

On this page

The main grievance of the few Hindu nationalist militants who had been planning to kill Gandhi was that Gandhi was pro-Pakistan and pro-Muslim. The Kashmir war that has been going on since in one form or another has cost us a lot of money, which could have been used for social development and welfare.

The immediate provocation to give a fresh look at this question was provided by the black and sad news of Pakistan coming under emergency rule Martial Law.

One can be reasonably sure that if India were not partitioned, this situation, and also that Pakistan has been under more or less perpetual military rule, would not have arisen.

Earlier in and Gandhi was rattled in that he lost his position of supreme leadership of the Congress party.

A murderous orgy

Gandhi had declared that if his programme and also resolution declaring the members who did not spin for half-an-hour a day and did not observe the five-fold boycott of legislative councils, law courts, government schools, titles and mill made cloth would have to resign from the All India Congress Committee.

This resolution, if carried, would have automatically excluded the Swarajists from power. Speaking for the Swarajists Pandit Motilal Nehru said: Discipline is desirable but it is not discipline for the majority to expel the minority.

That Congress is as much ours as our opponents and we will return with greater majority to sweep away those who stand for this resolution. One hundred and ten members remained when the resolution was put to the vote and was carried against 37 with six per cent abstentions.

This apparent victory of Gandhians was not a genuine win. Had the Swarajists remained in the hall, the resolution would have been defeated by about 20 votes. However, Gandhi recognised his defeat and dropped his resolution on compulsory spinning and the five-fold boycott by the workers making it only advisory in nature.

And with this and other concessions the Swarajists were persuaded to rejoin the Congress. About the issue M. Roy wrote in an article: Pattabhi Sitaramayya, in the Congress Presidential election. Gandhi and his disciples brought a charge of indiscipline against Subhash Bose.

But for the immoral political practice adopted by Gandhi and his followers in throwing out Subhash Bose from the Congress, things might have been different in the sense that Gandhi might not have remained the absolute leader for a long time.

One heroic figure of the Congress, Aruna Asaf Ali, wrote: But Gandhi then wrote to him to resign from the Presidentship of the Congress and also withdraw from its Working Committee.Issue 77 of INTERNATIONAL SOCIALISM, quarterly journal of the Socialist Workers Party (Britain) Published December Copyright © International Socialism.

The Origin of the Palestine-Israel Conflict. By Jews for Justice in the Middle East Published in Berkeley, CA, Jews for Justice has made this excellent resource available to people around the world.

The Arab-Israeli War. Prior to the UN General Assembly’s November decision to partition Palestine, King Abdullah had proposed sending the Arab Legion to defend the Arabs of Palestine.

The partition of was inevitable | Online Academic Writing Help at iridis-photo-restoration.com

A few weeks ago, a number of people started reporting having trouble with Siri. Phrases like 'Call my wife' or 'Tell my dad' stopped working. Siri knew who those people were but proclaimed 'Uh oh, I don't have a phone number for Jane Isa Doe.".

The partition of India led to more than a million deaths. One man, Lord Louis Mountbatten, who hurriedly drew the new borders in secret, is largely responsible. In India was declared an independent country from Britain, after years of peaceful and violent protests, pressure from all sides, and numerous promises. Not only this, but Pakistan was also formed by partitioning the country into two, providing a separate homeland for the Muslims of India. The First Partition of Poland took place in as the first of three partitions that ended the existence of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth by Growth in the Russian Empire's power, threatening the Kingdom of Prussia and the Habsburg Monarchy, was the primary motive behind this first partition. Frederick the Great engineered the partition to prevent Austria, jealous of Russian.

The Partition was inevitable. While a cursory reading of history seems to indicate that it was a snap decision, a more detailed reading would reveal that it has been in the works since early s.

In the aftermath of WW II, the British belatedly realised that they had to leave the subcontinent, which had begun to get out of their control through the s. Was Partition of India Inevitable? Wednesday 19 August , by R M Pal This article was sent to us quite sometime back but could not be used earlier for unavoidable reasons.

Was Partition of India Inevitable? - Mainstream Weekly