Excerpt from Research Paper:
It is also, however, defined by the work of Karl Marx, a nineteenth-century philosopher and revolutionary. Conflict theories — which emphasize class struggle and change — are often pitted against consensus theories, which emphasize social stability and shared norms.
The following will summarize Talcott Parsons' consensus theory known as structural functionalism, and the conflict theories of Ralf Dahrendorf and Randall Collins. The work of Karl Marx will be introduced as well. Even though consensus and conflict theories are often presented as opposing viewpoints, many theorists believe they are complementary.
Some even suggest they should be integrated into a single theory. These viewpoints will be discussed as well.
What role does conflict play in social organizations? Is conflict inherently bad? Is inequality a necessary part of any society? These are just a few of the questions that sociologists — and sociologists who describe themselves as conflict theorists, in particular — have attempted to answer.
Like the field of sociology in general, conflict theory has both modern and classical roots. Yet, the foundation of conflict theory rests largely upon the work of Karl Marx, a nineteenth-century philosopher and revolutionary.
Before investigating either the classical or modern roots of conflict theory, however, it's worthwhile to place conflict theory — and its counterpart, structural functionalism — in a broader context. According to Ritzer and Goodmanconflict theory and structural functionalism are part of a larger, ongoing debate between consensus theorists and conflict theorists.
In general, consensus theorists emphasize the stability of society. Shared norms, values, and laws all contribute to social order; change occurs slowly and in a peaceful and orderly fashion.
In contrast, conflict theorists view society through the lens of group domination — social order is a temporary state that results from the dominance of one group over another.
Change is both inevitable and good, occurring when subordinate groups overthrow dominant groups. Furthermore, change happens quickly, and often in a disorderly and forceful fashion. Some argue that the overarching labels 'consensus' and 'conflict' are artificial, masking important similarities among theorists and overlooking the ways in which they complement one another Bailey, For now, the terms provide a good starting point for understanding fundamental differences in sociological theories.
Structural Functionalism As one of the dominant paradigms in sociological thought, structural functionalism is an important theory in its own right.This theory is a social psychological theory thought to explain prejudice (Conflict Theories, ). An example for this would be immigration.
With all the bombings, terrorist attacks, and violence from one ethnic group or religious group. Just as a research problem in your paper requires contextualization and background information, a theory requires a framework for understanding its application to the topic being investigated.
When writing and revising this part of your research paper, keep in mind the following. - Stella Ting-Tommey's "Toward a Theory of Conflict and Culture" Introduction This research report is based on the article "Toward a Theory of Conflict and Culture" taken from the book Communication, Culture, and Organizational Processes.
Deviance, the violation of dominant societal norms, is defined from a sociological perspective. The major theorists associated with conflict theory, including Karl Marx and Max Weber, are. The Social Conflict Theory Sociology Essay.
Print Reference this. Published: 23rd March, Within these three approaches are several more ways to gain research (Conflict Theories, ). The social conflict theory tries to show that society creates conflict due to the inequalities that are present in everyday life.
Most sociologists will use. Conflict theory has both modern and classical roots; most recently, it developed in the late twentieth century in response structural functionalism. It is .